liberalism Essay -- essays research papers

There is no guessing where the oligarchs stand. "All power and wealth to the oligarchy" is their motto. Those existing in the scorn ranks of meagreness be of no concern to the upper class, exploiting new(prenominal) members of union are what they do best. The tory we find at the other end of the scale. In tory society tradition rules taking the groups well being rather than the single(a) is primary. Somewhere in the middle we have the liberals (some bleeding hearts, some non so much).Reason, rationality, logic, and thought are the theoretical source of legitimacy of the liberal. They consider that logic and intellect are infallible guides to action. case-by-caseism is fundamental to the culture. Individual self-interest is assumed to be the motivation of all actions. They feel that argument brings away the best in people and that this competition is necessary for the excerpt of society. The hierarchy of a liberal is one of merit. He believes that merit leave behi nd be rewarded with wealth. Anyone in a liberal culture who is not well-to-do is considered to be without merit. The poor deserve to be poor, liberals feel, since all individuals are big to achieve then those who dont must have something wrong with them. The liberal would the likes of the whole world to be middle class and feel convinced(predicate) that if the poor would only accept the cultural attributes and attitudes of the middle class their problems would be over. For if the poor had middle-class attitudes, they would soon have middle class incomes and female monarch all their problems would be gone. Despite the liberals competitiveness, they do have what one competency refer to as a soft sport for children of the poor. They dont believe these children should be made to suffer due to their parents ineptitude. They feel that every individual should fall out out equally well equipped to compete. Therefore, liberals do invest in welfare to aid the children of the poor. Since the adult poor cannot be trusted or expected to implement these programs, extensive governmental organizations staffed by good liberals are necessary to correctly carry them out. They manage to give some answer to the poor but succeed in not hurting or changing the way of living of the rich.This parallels quite closely with the relationship amongst international lending institutions and third world countries. Agencies such as the introduction Bank and International Monetary... ...equences increased school fees force parents to pull children from school, literacy judge go down, poorly educated generation not equipped for hot jobs. This then brings us full circle although this is not how the liberal sees it. They do not see that their "help" has backfired and gotten these countries in an even more bitter situation. Instead they feel they have been validated. From their point of view they have reached out to the poor, given them the means and assistance needed to become successful and notwithstanding they are still impoverished. For the liberal this proves that the poor are indeed too dumb or lazy to ever move up in life. These countries continue in poverty after assistance, thus they are failures in the economic competition. Liberals see the debt problem and all the misery that results from it as not the fault of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, or any other International Financial Institution but rather the countrys.There is poverty because of exploitations. There is exploitation because of vulnerability. There is vulnerability because of a lack of power. REFERENCES spheric Exchange. www.globalexchange.org/wbimf/facts.html